Skip to content

Join Today

Member portal

NSW Teachers Federation
NSW Teachers Federation
  • Home
  • Courses
    • All Courses
    • All Conferences
    • Primary
    • Secondary
  • Journal
    • Journal Issue
    • For your Classroom
    • For your Staffroom
    • For your Future
    • For your Research
  • Podcast
  • About
    • Who we are
    • What we do
    • Our Presenters
    • FAQ
    • Contact Us
NSW Teachers Federation
  • Home
  • Courses
    • All Courses
    • All Conferences
    • Primary
    • Secondary
  • Journal
    • Journal Issue
    • For your Classroom
    • For your Staffroom
    • For your Future
    • For your Research
  • Podcast
  • About
    • Who we are
    • What we do
    • Our Presenters
    • FAQ
    • Contact Us

Subject: EAL/D

Now more than ever: a National Anti-Racism Framework

Mandy Wells discusses the need for a National Anti-Racism Framework and Strategy…

The rise of fascist ideologies, characterised by authoritarianism, suppression of dissent, the elevation of groups of people above others and exclusionary nationalism, poses a profound threat to our democracy. History demonstrates that such movements erode societies gradually, normalising racism and discrimination, undermining independent voices and those who speak out, and reframing inequality as a necessity for patriotism. These shifts rarely occur overnight; instead, they establish themselves slowly and then burgeon when fear is exploited and division is politically rewarded.

Selective empathy is one of the most dangerous enablers of this process. When care, compassion and protection are extended to some communities but withheld from others, the principle of equal dignity under the law is compromised. Human rights are not hierarchical, nor are they conditional on popularity, political convenience, or conservative, opinion-based media narratives. A society that only defends the rights of those it favours or selectively applies enforcement of rights to those it privileges, ultimately weakens protections for everyone.

Discrimination and partisan protections fracture social cohesion. Policies that marginalise certain groups whilst affirming others creates structural division and social stratification. Such division undermines trust in governments and institutions, and instead fosters inequality and resentment, rather than unity.

Blaming groups of people within our communities for inadequate government services and public provision further distorts social disparity and public discourse. Economic strains on education, healthcare, housing and other important infrastructure are more accurately linked to successive years of poor government policy decisions, inadequate funding priorities, and long-term planning failures. Redirecting frustration toward migrants or other marginalised groups within our communities diverts accountability away from governance and fuels hate, without resolving any of the identified systemic shortcomings.

Often coinciding with, and of equal concern, is the selective adherence to human rights obligations when politicians and vested lobby groups start to feel pressured by their perceived failures. Governments that champion the rights of people when politically advantageous, yet sideline them when it becomes politically inconvenient, weaken the rule of law. Human rights frameworks exist precisely to safeguard individuals and minorities from populist political interests. Their legitimacy depends on consistent, principled application – and the courage of conviction from those in positions of power.

Democratic rights and resilience require everyone’s vigilance. It demands equal protection under the law, accountability in governance, responsible public discourse, and an unwavering commitment to universal human rights. Unaddressed inequities, systemic barriers and the deliberate dissemination of misinformation undermine these efforts towards unity. When empathy becomes selective, when blame is used to deflect attention from fair and considered policy making, and when human rights are treated as optional, the foundations of democracy are put at risk.

Social inclusion is essential to building a fair, cohesive Australia where every person, regardless of background, culture, or identity, can thrive. Blaming groups within our society for social or economic pressures distracts from the real structural issues that require policy solutions. Instead of directing frustration toward vulnerable communities, Australians should be holding governments to account for enacting policies that uphold equal rights for all, which will in turn ensure equitable access to systemic provisions such as education, housing, healthcare and employment.

Towards an Anti-Racism Framework

To progress such outcomes requires brave choices with legislation from both federal and state governments. Unlike other democracies in the world, Australia does not have an enforceable Human Rights Act, nor does it have a Bill of Rights or Framework for Anti-Racism. By committing to the protection of rights under law, parliamentary decisions would have a necessary umbrella of accountability, which would then provide the settings for fairer and inclusive decision-making, the protection of important rights for all within our communities, and the necessary funding and access to public provision.  Parliament would be required to consider how laws impact upon human rights and our institutions would need to respect people’s rights when developing policy. Courts would also have the capacity to assess whether laws are compatible with human rights, so that they then become the standards afforded to all.

On 13 May 2022, the Australian Labor Party (ALP) announced its commitment to fund the Australian Human Rights Commission (AHRC) to complete a National Anti-Racism Framework and implement a comprehensive national anti-racism strategy if elected to government.  In quotes attributable to Mark Dreyfus, Shadow Attorney General at the time, “Any government truly committed to Australia’s continued success as a multicultural nation must also be committed to tackling racism…We must do more to protect our great multicultural nation from those who would seek to cause division and conflict”.[i]

This promised funding commitment was realised when the Albanese government came to power. Those supporting such advocacy commended both the AHRC and the Australian government’s recognition that racism causes real harm, divides our communities, and undermines what is fair and just in Australian society. On 26 November 2024, Australia’s Race Discrimination Commissioner launched what it called “the most comprehensive plan ever for eliminating racism in Australia”, adding that its “National Anti-Racism Framework provides a roadmap for governments, business and community organisations to address all forms of racism”. It contained “63 recommendations for a whole of society approach to eliminating racism, with proposed reforms across Australia’s legal, justice, health, education, media and arts sectors as well as workplaces and data collection”. It then called on the “Australian Government to establish a National Anti-Racism Taskforce to implement the Framework’s recommendations”.[ii]

To date, there has been no formal response from the Albanese Government, nor one recommendation actioned.

A strong national Anti-Racism Framework would provide the structure, accountability, and leadership needed to address systemic discrimination and promote equity across institutions. It would provide the coordinated and national action needed to eliminate racism and centre all actions on truth-telling, lived experience, cultural respect, and justice.

Being actively anti-racist means more than rejecting prejudice — it means challenging systems and narratives that unfairly disadvantage Aboriginal peoples and Torres Strait Islander peoples, migrants, and culturally diverse communities. Racism harms not only those targeted, but society as a whole, by weakening social cohesion and undermining equal opportunity.

Teachers and Public Schools

Public schools operate on the principle that all students live, learn, and play together safely and respectfully. Diversity is seen as a strength of the system, and inclusive environments are deemed to be essential for student and staff wellbeing, engagement, and achievement. They are also crucial to creating the sense of community belonging that is needed if we are ever to achieve so-called “social cohesion”, the political buzzword that is being weaponised rather than being cited as a sound reason for legislating fair, equitable public provision and the consistent valuing of all within our communities through needs-based funding and services that ensure inclusion.

Teachers play a critical role in shaping inclusive education environments where diversity is respected and racism and/or discrimination is actively addressed. Through culturally responsive teaching, honest engagement with Australia’s history, and clear anti-racism policies, educators can foster understanding, empathy, and a feeling of true belonging among students and communities.

Union solidarity and advocacy — such as that demonstrated by the Federation through its many Conference and Council decisions on valuing diversity, equity, social inclusion and peace, along with its commitments to Australian Education Union decisions — can further strengthen these efforts by advocating for equitable funding, safe workplaces, anti-discrimination protections, and professional development that equips teachers to effectively challenge and eliminate racism. When teachers stand together, they amplify their capacity to demand systemic change and to protect both students and staff from discrimination.

Our education system must now ensure that all students, staff, and families —particularly Aboriginal peoples and Torres Strait Islander peoples, multicultural and multi-faith communities — feel safe, supported, and valued.

The NSW Department of Education already has in place a robust set of policies and procedures that mandate anti-racism and promote intercultural inclusivity. These feature compliance training for all teachers, the mandatory appointment of Anti-Racism Contact Officers (ARCOs) in every school, mandatory classroom education and community reporting requirements and guidance on supporting students during times of crisis. These policies and procedures are inclusive of addressing racism, hate, harassment, discrimination, vilification, antisocial behaviour, and bullying.

It must be noted that these advancements did not come by accident, nor through good systemic governance. They have instead been achieved through union advocacy – Federation Conference and Council decisions taken since 1947 onwards; and a commitment to social justice advocacy that puts equity, inclusion and needs-based resourcing at the heart of all we pursue.

The goal of eliminating racism in all its forms is a whole-school obligation and therefore, the responsibility of every teacher and staff member in our schools. Federation advocacy revolves around achieving improvements to policy settings without privileging or marginalising particular groups.

Structural division, selective empathy, and inequitable access to support are what truly undermines social cohesion and contradicts the core values of public education. So too does low expectations. So, we need all teachers to set their standards high, connect anti-racism to behaviour expectations and to appropriately respond to hate, discrimination and racism, with consequences that show it will not be tolerated in any form, and it will be eliminated.

Hate-fuelled politics, policies that create exclusion, elevate a privileged few above others, or respond selectively to political pressure risk reinforcing structural division rather than eliminating hate. Unaddressed inequities, the denial of the true history of this country, underfunding of and unequal access to support for identified need, along with the selective application of the rule of law perpetuate systemic racism and undermine efforts to build a better nation.

Calls for unity will always be undermined when government or institutional policies are inconsistent or unevenly applied. What Australia needs is to stop punching down and instead aim high. When individuals action anti-racism, we all make a difference and move closer to achieving true inclusion, belonging and social cohesion. All forms of hate, racism, and discrimination must be addressed with equal seriousness. As teacher unionists, we must educate our students, support our colleagues and lead our communities in this space.

On the International Day for the Elimination of Discrimination, 21 March 2026, Race Discrimination Commissioner Ghiridaran Sivaraman stated that “On this day we are reminded that real and lasting change begins with listening. This starts with centring the voices, experiences and truths of First Peoples which is foundational to addressing and ending racism in Australia”.[iii]

A Shared Responsibility

Eliminating racism is a collective responsibility shared by governments, schools, unions, communities, and individuals. By embedding anti-racism principles into laws, public policy, and school curricula, and by advocating for the fair distribution of resources and services, Australia can create inclusive environments where everyone is supported to succeed. Through sustained commitment, informed advocacy, and shared accountability, we can achieve positive outcomes that strengthen educational success, wellbeing, and social cohesion across the nation.

Existing Anti-Discrimination and Racial Discrimination Acts in place nationally are worthy laws and protections – but they do not cover all, and worse, they put the onus on those targeted to effect justice or prosecute for change. We need a National Anti-Racism Framework that ties these important legislations together and puts accountability squarely where it belongs – that being the government at all levels and its institutions.

As famously quoted by Nelson Mandela “Education is the most powerful weapon which you can use to change the world”.

Together, we must collectively rise, unite for change and walk together towards achieving a better future for all.

About the author

Mandy was born on the Lands of the Dharawal and grew up on Dharawal, Bidjigal, Whadjuk and Awabakal Lands. She now lives on Dharug and Gundungurra Lands in the beautiful Blue Mountains.

Mandy taught for 35 years in diverse primary school settings in Sydney’s southwest and west, teaching students of EAL/D, refugee, asylum seeker and migrant backgrounds. She has been working as Federation’s Multicultural/City Organiser for the Fairfield Teachers Association, IEC and Secondary Colleges of Languages workplaces since the start of 2020 and is committed to working with teachers and principals in organizing for all students to have access to the highest quality public education.

Mandy is passionate about social justice, human rights and equitable access to education. She leads Federation’s Anti-Racism Restricted Committee and has helped develop Federation resources for implementation of this policy. Mandy is also the officer attached to the Anti-Racism Special Interest Group (SIG), Sport SIG and the Swimming and Water Safety SIG. She has been elected by Council to represent Federation with the affiliated organisations Refugee Council of Australia and the Ethnic Communities’ Council of NSW, and is also an active member Federation’s Officers Working Conditions and NAIDOC Committees.


[i] https://www.andrewgiles.com.au/news/media-releases/labor-commits-to-new-anti-racism-strategy/

[ii] https://humanrights.gov.au/about-us/media-centre/media-releases/landmark-national-plan-seeks-end-racism-australia#:~:text=’Racism%20causes%20incredible%20harm%20to

[iii] https://www.instagram.com/p/DWIqinEoLQY/

Now more than ever – Mandy WellsDownload

Tell Me Your Story: Supporting EAL/D students in language and literacy development

Tell Me Your Story: Supporting EAL/D students in language and literacy development

Overview

The focus of this one day course presented by Kathy Rushton and Joanne Rossbridge is to develop understandings and strategies for participants who support EAL/D students in both small groups and mainstream classrooms.

Practical strategies will be provided to foster the use of English language while encouraging students to use all the linguistic resources that they bring to school, including the use of their first language. Consideration will be given to the wellbeing framework and supporting students in an inclusive environment which honours and confirms their identity, language, and culture.

Participants will:

  • Extend their knowledge, skills and understanding in the development of oral language with
    links to the mode continuum to support English as an Additional Language or Dialect (EAL/D)
    students.
  • Explore the relationship between spoken and written language through unpacking lexical
    density and grammatical intricacy
  • Engage in activities to expand their strategies to develop a reading sequence with
    consideration of Field, Tenor and Mode, vocabulary and language features
  • Engage in activities showcasing strategies in developing a ‘tanslanguaging space’ to support
    literacy.
  • Extend their understanding on the role of joint construction in the teaching and learning cycle.

4 September 2026 at NSW Teachers Federation, Surry Hills

All CPL courses run from 9am to 3pm.

$220

Please note, payment for courses is taken after the course takes place.

Joanne Rossbridge is an independent language and literacy consultant working in both primary and secondary schools and with teachers across Australia. She has worked as a classroom teacher and literacy consultant with the DET (NSW). Her expertise and much of her experience is in working with students from diverse linguistic and cultural backgrounds. Joanne is particularly interested in student and teacher talk and how talk about language can assist the development of language and literacy.

Kathy Rushton is interested in the development of language and literacy especially in disadvantaged communities. She has worked as a classroom teacher and literacy consultant and provides professional learning for teachers in the areas of language and literacy development. Her current research projects include a study of multilingual pre-service teachers and the impact that teacher professional learning has on the development of a creative pedagogical stance which supports translanguaging and student identity and wellbeing.

Primary and Secondary teachers who support EAL/D students in both small groups and mainstream classrooms.

Teacher Librarians

It’s Complex: Working with Students of Refugee Backgrounds and Their Families in NSW Public Schools

Professor Megan Watkins and Professor Greg Noble present a research-based examination of the complexities involved in working with students of refugee backgrounds in our schools. They discuss why it is both inherently difficult and necessary for NSW public school teachers to strive to meet the needs of these students and their families . . . 

In mid-2021, the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) estimated the total number of refugees world-wide was 27.1 million (Refugee Council of Australia, 2022). This number has risen dramatically in recent years due to the increasing number and intensity of conflicts in Ukraine, the Middle East, Africa and parts of Asia, forcing many to flee their homelands and seek safety elsewhere. Many of these refugees are under 18 years old, and many are unaccompanied minors. While Australia’s proportion of this number is relatively low, thousands of young refugees (Refugee Council of Australia, 2017) enter Australia each year on humanitarian visas and face the daunting prospect of beginning school in their newfound home with limited or no English, limited or no literacy in their first language, disrupted or no previous schooling, and the scars of trauma resulting from the experiences of war, the death of loved ones, poverty and protracted periods of displacement in refugee camps and/or one or more countries of transit (Yak, 2016). Once settled, many may be under pressure to earn an income or to help other members of their family, which affects their attendance and progress at school (Refugee Council of Australia, 2016). In addition to contending with these difficulties, issues around gender, faith and racism may affect their capacity to ‘fit in’ (Yak, 2016).  

The New South Wales (NSW) Department of Education (DoE) now records that there are more than 11,000 students of refugee backgrounds in NSW schools (NSW DoE, 2020). While many of these students are located in metropolitan Sydney, in particular in the western and south-western suburbs, there is an increasing number settling in regional areas, posing considerable challenges for schools and their communities to ensure that these students’ complex needs are met. Schools are often the first point of contact with wider Australian society for young refugees, so how schools position and serve them has enormous consequences (Uptin et al., 2013).  

Various community, government and non-government organisations have provided considerable assistance to schools, but a number of studies suggest that not only is far more needed (Sidhu et al., 2011; Block et al., 2014), but that further research is required to gauge refugee students’ experiences of schooling and whether current practice is addressing their needs and those of teachers (Ferfolja and Vickers, 2010). 

 In 2019, the NSW Teachers Federation commissioned researchers at Western Sydney University to undertake such a study to help fill this gap and to yield data to inform how they may best support teachers working in these complex environments. The report, It’s Complex! Working with Students of Refugee Backgrounds and their Families in New South Wales Schools, (Watkins, M., Noble, G., & Wong, A. ,2019) is the product of this research. Its title, drawn from a comment made by one of the teacher participants, reflects not only the complex needs of refugee students and their families but the inherent complexity of meeting these needs often within schools already grappling with the challenges of socio-economic disadvantage, increasing cultural and linguistic diversity and students with physical and intellectual disabilities. Meeting the needs of students of refugee backgrounds is undertaken alongside those of other students, making the task for teachers a complex one indeed.  

It’s Complex aimed to capture this complexity. The research informing the report included interviews and focus groups with executive staff and teachers, students with and without refugee backgrounds and the parents or carers of students of refugee backgrounds in ten public schools. These schools included primary schools, high schools and Intensive English Centres (IECs) in Sydney and regional locations in NSW, with high and low populations of students of refugee backgrounds and varying numbers of students with a Language Background Other Than English (LBOTE) amongst their broader populations. The study also involved observations in classrooms, playgrounds and at school community events. In addition to school-derived data, interviews were also held with relevant personnel in organisations supporting refugee students and their families. 

The study examined the challenges faced by school communities as a result of their increasing number of students of refugee backgrounds. It looked at the educational and broader needs of these students; the programs in place to support them within schools; the links between educational experiences and other aspects of the settlement process and the social contexts in which settlement occurs; the consequences for teacher workloads and their professional capacities; and a range of other issues. This article provides a broad overview of the project’s key findings with a link here to the full report for more detailed examination of these from the perspectives of each of the various informant groups that participated in the study.  

One of the key findings of the research was that the needs of students of refugee backgrounds are not simply the pragmatic requirements of educational performance, these students also have complex linguistic, social, cultural, psychological and economic needs. In discussion with principals and other senior executive across the 10 project schools, the area of greatest need identified was that of welfare, not only ensuring students were fed, housed and felt safe but that there was support for those who experienced psychological trauma as, without addressing this, it was considered difficult for students’ educational needs to be met. Yet these respondents also stressed the highly individualised nature of these students’ needs with one teacher remarking: ‘all refugee students struggle but struggle in different ways. We have very capable students, students that have, you know, not as much capacity to learn as others. And some are very bright – a full range of learners’.   

While not news to school executive and teachers, the research revealed how schools are much more than educational institutions. This may have always been the case, but with increasing and diversifying refugee intakes, they have become complex sites of refugee and community support, with greater expectations and challenges. As one principal commented: ‘I guess we are kind of, we have almost become a community centre, and this is something that I find quite challenging … So, we get a lot of requests that are far removed from our brief as a school’. Schools, therefore, are grappling with a range of issues that result from these greater expectations: teacher workload, professional learning, funding issues, interagency coordination and community liaison. 

The research also found that there were uneven levels of expertise and support across schools, both by region and by type, and related to school and community contexts, and individual teacher’s experiences. There are schools, such as IECs, which are set up well to meet these challenges, developing significant banks of expertise and resources, and there are schools which, by dint of their location and demographics, are not well set-up nor well-funded.  

Many teachers are providing additional support beyond the classroom in terms of arranging homework clubs, extra work, support services, community liaison, etc, creating increased and intensified workloads which have stressful consequences for work-life balance and some teachers’ mental health. Many teachers are providing this extra support but with varying degrees of experience and expertise. Many do not have English as an Additional Language or Dialect (EAL/D) qualifications, for example, exacerbating the stressful circumstances in which they are working. Many are also finding themselves in classrooms with an increasing complexity of student populations, posing challenges for classroom teaching. 

This was matched with very uneven levels of understanding in schools – amongst teachers, non-refugee students and the wider community – of the complex experiences and challenges faced by students of refugee backgrounds. Staff in schools often struggled to ‘get the right balance’ between addressing the pastoral, the academic and the socio-cultural needs of students of refugee backgrounds with huge implications for these students’ learning. One executive staff member reflected on the problem of an overemphasis on the pastoral: 

“I think that when we are dealing with our students one-on-one and we start to hear and get to know them more and hear the history of where they have come from and their trauma, there can be a bit of a tendency to make excuses for them not improving academically and as strongly as they could and … I am going to use the word ’pity’, like there can be an element not from all teachers but from some teachers.” 

An executive member at another school suggested such an approach raised questions about the nature of wellbeing itself: ‘So, it is striking that balance between wellbeing as welfare and wellbeing as self-esteem and achievement’.  

As a consequence, students of refugee backgrounds have very varied educational experiences: some are settling well, and some are not ‘fitting in’. While most value the efforts undertaken at their schools, as do their parents and carers, many are also suffering from a lack of support. These students are also faced with the dilemma of in\visibility: they often stand out – for various reasons – but their needs are often ‘invisible’, and they can fall through cracks in the system. Many students recounted the enormous challenges of English language and literacy acquisition and often felt underprepared for their educational experiences. Many students continued to experience enormous problems in the transition from IECs to high school and there appeared little progress in addressing these issues, despite being well documented in previous research (Hammond, 2014). 

Many students of refugee backgrounds reported the ongoing incidence of racism, though this is not always acknowledged by staff in schools. This racism varied in scale and type from microaggressions of other students avoiding contact and making veiled derogatory comments, to forms of structural racism often resulting from well-intentioned programs that actually reinforced these students’ lack of belonging. In one example of the former, in a school with a predominantly Anglo-Australian student population attended by a small number of refugee students of African backgrounds, a teacher referred to students making racist taunts in the form of ‘back door kind of comments’. The teacher explained how students would say: ‘So, they are asking for a black pen, like they will disguise the racism and emphasise certain things like, “Can I have a black pen?” or something like that. Whereas I shut that down immediately’.  

While schools provided various forms of assistance, many continued to struggle with developing and sustaining productive relations with parents of refugee backgrounds and their wider communities. 

The work of Refugee Support Leaders (RSLs), a temporary measure introduced in response to the arrival of large numbers of Syrian refugees in 2016, proved increasingly important in many schools and their broader communities. RSLs took up roles in the wake of the loss of the NSW Department of Education Multicultural Education/EAL/D consultants that occurred in 2012, a loss which has been detrimental for many schools. A pleasing development, following the publication of It’s Complex, and because of the NSW Teachers Federation’s advocacy, has been the appointment of EAL/D Leader roles seemingly filling the void of the previous Multicultural Education/EAL/D consultants. These are much needed positions which, it is hoped, are ongoing, supporting schools in meeting the EAL/D needs of not only refugee students, but the many students who require specialist EAL/D teaching.  

Finally, while much work has been done to address issues around the coordination of governmental and non-governmental agencies in the area of refugee settlement, this has not always been embedded well in daily practice in schools. For this work to be consolidated and extended we must enable multiple, critical conversations – between the Department, support organisations and schools; between teachers, students, parents/carers and their wider communities – around students’ educational, pastoral and social needs, and the capacities of schools to address them. Failure to facilitate such dialogue will threaten the stability of life that students of refugee backgrounds and their families so urgently need. 

A useful starting point will be looking at the full report, which can be found at: 

https://www.nswtf.org.au/files/18530_its_complex_centenary_report_digital.pdf

If you are interested in applying to the It’s Complex: Working with students of refugee backgrounds in NSW public schools professional learning course run by the Centre for Professional Learning, please click here.

Block, K., Cross, S., Riggs, E. and Gibbs, L. (2014). Supporting schools to create an inclusive environment for refugee students. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 18(12), 1337-1355. 

Ferfolja, T. and Vickers, M. (2010). Supporting refugee students in school education in Greater Western Sydney. Critical Studies in Education, 51(2), 149-162. 

Hammond, J. (2014). The transition of refugee students from Intensive English Centres to mainstream high schools: Current practices and future possibilities. Sydney: NSW Department of Education and Communities.   

New South Wales (NSW) Department of Education (DoE)(2020) Supporting Refugee Students https://education.nsw.gov.au/teaching-and-learning/curriculum/multicultural-education/refugee-students-in-schools.  

Refugee Council of Australia. (2016). Education and training. Retrieved from https://www.refugeecouncil.org.au/getfacts/settlement/learninghere/education-and-training/ (viewed 13 November, 2018). 

Refugee Council of Australia. (2017). UNHCR global trends 2016 – How Australia compares with the world. Retrieved from https://www.refugeecouncil.org.au/getfacts/statistics/intl/unhcr-global-trends-2016-australia-compares-world/ (viewed on 13 November, 2018). 

Refugee Council of Australia. (2022). How many refugees are there in the world? Retrieved from https://www.refugeecouncil.org.au/how-many-refugees/ (viewed on 5 September, 2022) 

Sidhu, R., Taylor, S. and Christie, P. (2011). Schooling and Refugees: Engaging with the complex trajectories of globalisation. Global Studies of Childhood, 1(2), 92-103. 

Uptin, J., Wright, J. and Harwood, V. (2013). ‘It felt like I was black dot on white paper’: examining young former refugees’ experience of entering Australian high schools. Australian Educational Researcher, 40(1), 125-137. 

Yak, G. (2016). Educational barriers facing South Sudanese Refugees in Australia, Refugee Communities Advocacy Network conference, Melbourne, 28 May 2016. Retrieved from http://www.refugeecouncil.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/Gabriel-Yak-RCAN.pdf (viewed 13 November, 2018).  

Watkins, M., Noble, G., & Wong, A. (2019). It’s Complex: Working with students of refugee backgrounds and their families in New South Wales public schools (2nd ed.). NSW Teachers Federation. 

https://www.nswtf.org.au/files/18530_its_complex_centenary_report_digital.pdf

Megan Watkins is Professor in the School of Education at Western Sydney University. Her research interests lie in the cultural analysis of education exploring the impact of cultural diversity on schooling and the ways in which different cultural practices can engender divergent habits and dispositions to learning. Megan began her career as an English/History teacher working in high schools in Western Sydney. Her most recent book is Doing Diversity Differently in a Culturally Complex World: Critical Perspectives on Multicultural Education (Bloomsbury, 2021) with Greg Noble.  

Greg Noble is Professor at the Institute for Culture and Society, Western Sydney University. Greg has been involved in research in multiculturalism and education for thirty years. His interests have centred around the relations between youth, ethnicity, gender and schooling, as well as aspects of curriculum and pedagogy in multicultural education. He also has broader research interests in issues of migration, ethnic communities and intercultural relations. He has published eleven books, including: Doing Diversity Differently in a Culturally Complex World (2021) and Disposed to Learn (2013), both with Megan Watkins, and Cultures of Schooling (1990).  

Its-Complex-Noble-WatkinsDownload
Its-Complex-Full-ReportDownload

‘Including’ English as an Additional Language or Dialect Learners in your Classroom

Cindy Valdez explores some of the strategies that help to support English as an Additional Language or Dialect (EAL/D) learners in your classrooms. Ensuring that EAL/D students feel included in the classroom helps to address their academic and emotional needs. . . 

“The [Alice Springs (Mparntwe) Education] Declaration has two distinct but interconnected goals: 

Goal 1: The Australian education system promotes excellence and equity  

Goal 2: All young Australians become: 

•      confident and creative individuals 

•      successful lifelong learners 

•      active and informed members of the community. 

Achieving these education goals is the responsibility of Australian Governments and the education community in partnership with young Australians, their families and carers and the broader community. “(Education Council, 2019) 

In line with this policy, my vision for all students, regardless of their backgrounds, is that they be included in their classroom lessons, and they are able to access the Australian Curriculum, so that every student feels that they have a rightful place in their learning environments. A student, regardless of their race, socio-economic background, physical or intellectual ability should be able to be part of any classroom and receive the quality education that they deserve and are entitled to. It may be a challenge, but it is achievable.  During planning and programming sessions, my role as the English as an Additional Language or Dialect (EAL/D) Specialist teacher/mentor has been to ask my colleagues to reflect upon the following questions. In this paper I pose the same questions with my responses. 

“How do I ensure that each student feels that they belong and is included in my classroom?” 

‘Belonging’ and ‘inclusivity’ could mean different things to different people. Some would say that it means that each child is ‘heard’ or ‘seen’, that their thoughts and views are valued. Others would say that each child feels that they ‘fit’ in, or that they ‘get along’ with everyone in the classroom. Whatever it is, there’s a general consensus that to feel ‘included’ means that your contributions are valued; you are allowed to have, and to express, your own opinions; you are treated with kindness and respect; and last, but not least, you are seen as a ‘worthy conversational partner’ by your peers. 

For me, there is another ‘layer’ to being ‘included’ and ‘belonging’ in the classroom. That is, that each individual is seen as part of a ‘community of practice‘. In a recent article I read, “Scaffolding Practice: Supporting Emerging Bilinguals’ Academic Language 

Use in Two Classroom Communities” (Pacheco, M., Shannon, D. & Pray, L. (2017). the authors described this practice as: 

“…community-focused, language-as-practice perspective of academic language builds from the foundation that a classroom is a community of practice (Lave & Wenger, 1991), or a group of individuals that engage one another with shared resources to work toward common goals. With this perspective, we frame academic language as practices, or the different ways that 

students and teachers use language to participate in activities that are recognized and valued by other community members” 

(Pacheco, M., Shannon, D. & Pray, L. p.65, 2017). 

How do I design learning experiences that are ‘intellectually challenging’ (Dufficy, 2005) for my students?

As we need to engage our EAL/D learners in learning that involves higher order thinking, critical thinking, collaboration and problem solving, teachers need to: make decisions about the ‘BIG IDEA’ that we want all students to know about and understand; formulate ‘essential questions’ so that all students know ‘why’ we are learning what we are learning about; and design a ‘rich task’ to consolidate and demonstrate new learnings.  

EAL/D learners will greatly benefit from participating in High Challenge/High Support programs. These programs aim for deep knowledge and deep learning, whilst providing EAL/D learners with high levels of targeted support via two aspects of scaffolding: ‘designed-in scaffolding’ (carefully planned sequence of learning experiences), and ‘contingent scaffolding’ (point of need teaching). (Hammond & Gibbons, 2005). 

In a classroom where a ‘community of practice’ is evident, both teacher and student scaffold the academic language in order for everyone to be able to participate in meaningful and purposeful classroom talk. We often push our EAL/D learners towards being able to justify, describe and explain their thinking because as we know “academic language is not something that a student does or does not have, but a practice that a student does” (Pacheco, M et al, 2016, p. 65).  

We must clarify our students’ thinking by asking questions to ‘extend’ the talk in an attempt to engage them in substantive conversations, “which could include attention to language at the vocabulary, syntax, and discourse levels.” (Pacheco, M. et al, 2017 p. 65) In a “community of practice”, the students will also extend the talk of their peers because the teacher has modelled the language. 

How do I scaffold EAL/D learners’ use of academic language and participation in class discussions?  

 EAL/D learners need to access all curriculum areas, access age-appropriate quality reading materials and access the academic language demands of every subject. This includes, for example, words with different shades of meaning, subject-specific vocabulary/language, scientific language and so forth. 

How do you ensure that students are thinking, talking and writing like scientists, historians, geographers, authors, artists or mathematicians?  

There are language and cultural implications for each subject that need to be considered. That is, EAL/D teachers need to consider the language demands specific for each subject by knowing the language structures, grammatical features and vocabulary development which need to be targeted and explicitly taught. 

Using History as the example, Paul Dufficy explains that when teaching History “…an important goal is to assist young people to become historians – to appropriate the texts, the ways and the dispositions of history and historians…in the process of becoming historians, children and young people are, potentially, becoming critical, fair-minded, optimistic, curious, courageous, and angered by injustice” (Paul Dufficy, 2005 p. 41). 

How do I ensure that everyone is included in EVERY lesson that I teach? How am I differentiating the curriculum so that all experience SUCCESS?

EAL/D learners need to be able to make connections to what they are learning about. Can they see their own culture and values in the unit of work? If not, how can we bring their ‘cultural capital’ into the curriculum? How do we ensure the learning is relevant to our EAL/D students? The goal is substantive engagement, not compliance and completion of busy work. Both the Learning Intention and Success Criteria need to be made visible to EAL/D learners so that they succeed in completing an open-ended rich task throughout the unit of work. 

What do I want my students to THINK about?

Teachers need to know their subject area, and the ‘why’ of the unit of work. Prioritise learning outcomes and take the ‘slow teaching’ approach. It’s not about ticking all the boxes, rather it’s about taking the time to design ‘deep’ learning and careful consideration given to what meaningful learning needs to happen in during each lesson.   

What BIG IDEAS do I want them to learn and understand?

Deconstruct the ‘big idea’, focus question, essential questions and the ‘why’ with your learners. The ‘big idea’ is what you want your students to think and learn about.  It could be written up as a question.  For example – to understand ‘characterisation’: “How do authors use emotive language and impactful noun groups to create characters that are believable?” This could then be deconstructed by unpacking the vocabulary words necessary to understand the question.  To ensure that everyone is on the same page.  

How do I design and sequence the learning?

· Backward map from the rich task so you know the end to plan ahead! Decide on the order in which you would like to tackle the unit. What do my students need to learn about first to achieve the learning outcome? Stage teams will find that this could look different in each class. 

· Frontload the vocabulary by selecting, highlighting and bringing to students’ attention key words, that are pertinent to understanding the text they’re about to read, view or listen to. 

· Visible thinking routines. Find ways to make your students’ thinking visible by engaging in various visible thinking routines such as ‘see, think, wonder’, ‘beginning, middle, end’ and ‘What makes you say that?’ to name a few. (Click here for the link to Harvard University’s Project Zero) 

· Message abundancy. EAL/D learners need to hear, see and use target language multiple times and in many different ways (i.e. message abundancy). Design learning activities that require all students to talk to complete learning tasks by, for example, engaging in visible thinking routines and communicative activities to use the target language/vocabulary. 

· Know thy students! Give your EAL/D learners timely feedback on both content and language learning. Let them know how they are going with acquiring the English language in their speaking, listening, reading/responding and writing. Both the ESL Scales & EAL/D Progression will assist in this process. Click here for more information 

Make their learning visible, for example, goal setting, wall charts, conferencing, and so forth. As well, plan for engaging ways for students to demonstrate their learning through, for example, the creation of an artwork. 

· Create your own resources to link with the current unit of work. Create your own modelled texts as sometimes ‘rich’ and age-appropriate reading material is hard to find so as a team, collaboratively construct your own.  Be mindful not to simplify the language too much as the inclusion of target and subject-specific vocabulary is a must! Learners of English will not learn the academic language unless they are exposed to it. Create other resources such as word/picture/meaning matching cards, cloze activities, ranking activities, margin questions (which may need to be read to your newly arrived students, and translated if possible). 

Learning a new language is best acquired in an inclusive environment where each person feels safe to flourish in.  An environment where a community of practice comprised of students and their teachers who all feel safe to take risks, understand that learning is messy, value connections, nurture respectful relationships, and understand that learning is best achieved when ‘we’re all in it together’.    

Dufficy, P. (2005). Designing learning for diverse classrooms. Newtown: Primary Teaching Association Australia. 

The Education Council (2019) The Alice Springs (Mparntwe) Education Declaration

Pacheco, M., Shannon D., & Pray, L. (2017). Scaffolding Practice: Supporting Emerging Bilinguals’ Academic Language Use in Two Classroom Communities. Language Arts, 95 (2), 63-76. 

Readings and resources: 

Hammond . J., (2012) “Hope and challenge in The Australian Curriculum: Implications for EAL students and their teachers” The Australian Journal of Language and Literacy 

https://www.alea.edu.au/documents/item/492

ACARA – EAL/D Teacher Resource link: 

http://www.acara.edu.au/curriculum/student-diversity/english-as-an-additional-Language-or-dialect 

ACARA – EAL/D Overview and Advice: 

http://docs.acara.edu.au/resources/EALD_Overview_and_Advice_revised_February_2014.pdf 

ACARA – EAL/D Progression: 

http://docs.acara.edu.au/resources/EAL_D_Learning_Progression_Foundation_to_Year_10_09052014_file_2.pdf 

ACARA – EAL/D Annotated Content Descriptions, Language/Cultural Considerations & Teaching Strategies: English: 

http://docs.acara.edu.au/resources/EALD_Learning_Area_Annotations_English_Revised_February_2014.pdf 

Mathematics: 

http://docs.acara.edu.au/resources/EALD_Learning_Area_Annotations_Maths_Revised_February_2014.pdf 

Science: 

http://docs.acara.edu.au/resources/EALD_Learning_Area_Annotations_Science_Revised_February_2014.pdf 

History: 

http://docs.acara.edu.au/resources/EALD_Learning_Area_Annotations_History_Revised_February_2014.pdf 

Australian Curriculum – Student Diversity Link: 

https://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/resources/student-diversity/

Harvard Graduate School of Education – Project Zero – Visible Thinking 

http://www.pz.harvard.edu/projects/visible-thinking 

Cindy Valdez has been an EAL/D specialist for over 20 years.  She has predominantly worked in south-west Sydney and is passionate about inclusion, developing others as leaders in the EAL/D space, and catering for the academic and wellbeing needs of EAL/D learners, including students from refugee backgrounds.  

 Cindy led various action learning projects during her role as a Refugee Support Leader in 2017-2019.  She is currently an EAL/D Education Leader at the NSW Department of Education, and President of the Association for Teaching English to Speakers of Other Languages (ATESOL) NSW.   

Including-EALD-learners-in-your-classroom-Cindy-ValdezDownload

Tell Me Your Story: Supporting EAL/D Students from K-8

Tell Me Your Story: Supporting EAL/D Students from K-8

Overview

We will focus on oral language development as the basis for developing literacy through the cyclical use of a range of strategies. This will be achieved through consideration of how students need to make meaning in curriculum contexts with a particular emphasis on developing knowledge about language, particularly grammar and vocabulary.

The focus of this three day course presented by Kathy Rushton and Joanne Rossbridge is to develop understandings and strategies for participants who support EAL/D students in both small groups and mainstream classrooms.

Practical strategies will be provided to foster the use of English Language (L2) while encouraging students to use all the linguistic resources that they bring to school, including the use of their first language (L1). Consideration will be given to the wellbeing framework and supporting students in an inclusive environment which honours and confirms their identity, language, and culture.

Open All

No dates available

All CPL courses run from 9am to 3pm.

Day 1 – Speaking and Listening
  1. Principles of second language learning
  2. Lexical density and grammatical intricacy: The relationship between grammar and vocabulary development
  3. The Mode Continuum
  4. Elaborated and restricted codes and the relationship between L1 and L2
  5. Strategies for developing oral language through planning and the cyclical use of range of activities, e.g. communicative activities, group work, drama, rhymes, chants, poems. Link back to the mode continuum.
  6. Select a picture book and, based on today’s session, prepare strategies. Explanation of task for Session 2.
Day 2 – Reading
  1. Introduction of Field, Tenor and Mode.
  2. Before, during and after reading and in preparation for writing with a focus on:
    – field building activities to acknowledge and build on cultural knowledge (before)
    – intonation, pronunciation, punctuation and spelling (during)
    – inferential comprehension (after)
  3. Strategies for categorising vocabulary and working with language features
  4. Share strategies for selected picture book with a small group
  5. Explanation of task for Session 3.
Day 3 – Writing
  1. The teaching and learning cycle
  2. Identifying strategies for developing writing through a joint construction.
  3. Strategies for supporting written like text, eg Readers Theatre, Dictogloss, Running dictation, Advance /Detail
  4. Making links to the community through writing for a purpose
  5. Prepare notes for the joint construction of a Literary Recount and an Exposition using selected text.
Joanne Rossbridge

Joanne Rossbridge is an independent language and literacy consultant working in both primary and secondary schools and with teachers across Australia. She has worked as a classroom teacher and literacy consultant with the DET (NSW). Her expertise and much of her experience is in working with students from diverse linguistic and cultural backgrounds. Joanne is particularly interested in student and teacher talk and how talk about language can assist the development of language and literacy.

Kathy Rushton

Kathy Rushton is interested in the development of language and literacy especially in disadvantaged communities. She has worked as a classroom teacher and literacy consultant and provides professional learning for teachers in the areas of language and literacy development. Her current research projects include a study of multilingual pre-service teachers and the impact that teacher professional learning has on the development of a creative pedagogical stance which supports translanguaging and student identity and wellbeing.

Primary and Secondary teachers who support EAL/D students in both small groups and mainstream classrooms.

$660 for 3 days

Please note, payment for courses is taken after the course takes place.

Three whole day workshops with participants actively engaged in each session and undertaking reading and assignments between sessions.

“Perfect balance of theory vs practical strategies. The theories and strategies will be impossible to forget – putting it into practice between session was great.”

“Loved the depth of knowledge on all aspects of literacy in the context of EAL/D learners.”

“So glad I attended – have learnt so much and feel inspired to share what I have learnt.”

“Presenters are absolutely fabulous! The perfect amount of banter and professionalism. They are experts in their field, and it shows. They invite the learner in – whatever level of knowledge they are coming with.”

JPL Articles

Critical Literacy in English and History: Stages 3 & 4
Critical Literacy in English and History: Stages 3 & 4
Helping Your Students to Become Better Writers
Helping Your Students to Become Better Writers
Tell Me Your Story: Working with EAL/D Students in Mainstream Classrooms
Tell Me Your Story: Working with EAL/D Students in Mainstream Classrooms

Recent Posts

    Recent Comments

    No comments to show.

    Archives

    No archives to show.

    Categories

    • No categories

    QUICK LINKS

    QUICK LINKS

    Join The Union

    Courses

    Journal

    Podcast

    Contact Us

    Share this page

    About

    Who we are

    What we do

    Presenters

    FAQ

    Professional Learning

    Courses

    Journal

    Podcast

    Policy and Guidelines

    Privacy Policy

    Social Media Guidelines

    Our Ethics

    Useful Links

    About

    Head Office Details

    Member Portal

    Media Releases

    Become a member today

    NSW Teachers Federation

    Connect with us

    © 2025 New South Wales Teachers Federation. All Rights Reserved. Authorised by Maxine Sharkey, General Secretary, NSW Teachers Federation, 23-33 Mary St. Surry Hills NSW 2010.